Sampling drum machine

Casio RZ-1

The RZ-1 paired twelve built-in drum sounds with short user samples.

The digital drum boom →
Casio RZ-1 front panel, photographed for International Musician, April 1986. Printed gutter retained.April 1986 · International Musician & Recording World / mu:zinesSource & credit ↗

Casio’s RZ-1 brought user sampling into a drum machine small and affordable enough to change the conversation in 1986.

Sources (10)
  1. Open source 1 ↗
  2. Open source 2 ↗
  3. Open source 3 ↗
  4. Open source 4 ↗
  5. Open source 5 ↗
  6. Open source 6 ↗
  7. Open source 7 ↗
  8. Open source 8 ↗
  9. Open source 9 ↗
  10. Open source 10 ↗

Source-led exhibition chapter

Casio RZ-1 — Four spaces for a new sound

In the 1986 magazine photograph, the Casio RZ-1 occupies the page like a small mixing desk. Faders run across the top, a display sits between two groups of controls, and the bottom row ends with four pale buttons. Those last four are the crucial invitation. Press one after capturing a sound and the machine can place that sound inside a rhythm. A drummer could bring in a rim or conga. Someone else could try a spoken word, a chord, or a noise from the room. The RZ-1 did not arrive with infinite storage. It made a little space for a player to decide what belonged in the kit.

Casio's twelve built-in percussion voices and the ability to write patterns gave it the bones of a drum machine. The user sampling made it different. Contemporary reviewers in April and May 1986 found that the process was short and direct enough to belong to ordinary music making rather than a specialist studio appointment. Peter Gleadall, reviewing for One Two Testing, gave the machine a British recommended price of £395; Bob Henrit's April review listed £399. They were contemporary published prices, not proof of what every buyer paid. Both help explain why the ability to sample was so arresting in this part of the market.

Silent memory-allocation study

Four spaces, redistributed.

Choose a documented allocation to inspect the available sampling time. This describes a period review; it does not emulate the RZ-1 or play sound.

Four spaces: 0.2 seconds available in each sample location. No audio is played.

Four small pieces of time

The sample memory could be divided into four spaces of roughly 0.2 seconds each, two of roughly 0.4 seconds, or one of roughly 0.8 seconds. The choice is worth giving visitors their hands on. Select four, two, or one on the page and watch the available time redistribute. Keep the interaction silent: it demonstrates the allocation reported in the period review, not the sound or exact behavior of an original RZ-1. The screen should show the time honestly, and the original photograph should remain nearby so the four real buttons are never replaced by an invented control surface.

Those fragments were long enough for a hit, a short word or a tight musical event, not a leisurely phrase. That limit is not a punchline about obsolete technology. It shaped what the RZ-1 asked a player to do: listen for the beginning of a sound, choose the moment of capture, and make the sample carry more weight than its duration suggested.

Bob Henrit's hands-on account describes the steps. Select a sample location, set the incoming level, and let the machine record what arrives. It also describes a more deliberate technique for catching an event within a longer source by holding and releasing the sample control at the wanted moment. There was no large waveform editor to rescue an indifferent cut afterwards. The performance of sampling happened before the new sound entered the pattern.

The tape in the box

The period account also describes a supplied cassette of sounds, cued by spoken announcements. A user could pause the tape and capture an offered drum or effect into one of the RZ-1's slots. This was not a digital preset expansion card; the sound passed through the input like any other recording. Another tape route let users save their own material for later. Tape was therefore both a source of new voices and a place to preserve work.

The cassette deserves a short, tactile sequence in the exhibition. Show an archival diagram of the path: narrated cassette cue → input level → chosen sample button → pattern. Make clear which steps the period review and owner instructions document. There is no need to animate an imaginary cassette or play an unverified factory tape. A real label or surviving recording can be added later if its provenance and publication status are established.

A pattern, then another decision

The RZ-1 had faders and separate outputs that made its voices useful in a larger studio, and reviewers could hear the compromises in its onboard sound and interface. Gleadall enjoyed the ease of putting a sound in, but disliked the friction of trying different pattern combinations. That criticism belongs beside the admiration. This was a fast route from found sound to a beat, with a machine's particular way of making its owner commit to a structure.

The built-in sounds were part of the same kit as the four new ones. In a pattern the question was not whether a sound was original or sampled, but what work it did. A sampled vocal stab could replace a conventional hit; a tiny piano chord might turn a rhythm into a tune. Henrit recalled the pleasure people took in trying voices and chords. That is a reviewer's observation of a session, not a claim that every RZ-1 owner made the same music.

Todd Terry and the four-track

Years later Todd Terry recalled the RZ-1 as his first machine. In a 2023 interview he described its four sample slots, putting kicks in some of them and using another for a bass-like noise or a horn. Then he bounced tracks down on a four-track recorder, adding more parts and making further bounces. He named “Bango,” “Can You Party” and “A Day in the Life” when explaining that early method. The account is valuable because it describes process, not merely a machine appearing in a gear list.

It is still important to leave room around the evidence. Terry did not itemize every beat or sample in every released version of those records. The exhibition can show a simple bounce diagram alongside a clearly dated portrait of him, and link to the full interview. It should not place his modern photograph inside the 1986 product scene or use it to identify a recording session that the photograph does not show.

His account also makes the RZ-1's small memory feel less like a restriction on an isolated box. Four sample pads met four recording tracks; each bounce created space for a further decision. The historical claim is not that this alone invented house music. It is that a named producer described using this modest machine and a four-track to make his early records. The technical limits and the human method are both visible.

One machine, a different experiment

Ilia Belorukov gives the RZ-1 another afterlife without relying on its user sampling at all. In notes for Arzed-One, he says he recorded the work in 2016 with only the Casio, using six factory sounds rather than the four sample slots: kick, snare, open and closed hi-hat, clap and cowbell. He became interested in what happened when repeated steps accelerated beyond 160 BPM and when he moved the tempo while the pattern remained otherwise the same. He describes recording several outputs and the room, then editing and mixing the result. The album appeared in 2017.

That account changes how to read the front panel. The white sample keys are the RZ-1's famous invitation, but the black factory-voice keys and tempo controls could also sustain an entire experiment. Place Belorukov's own account beside a short, silent tempo diagram. Do not stream the album's protected audio without a separate permission basis, and do not imply that his record used new samples because the hardware could store them.

A machine to inspect

The RZ-1 stands where sampling entered a more reachable part of rhythm making. Its magazine image, even with the printed gutter running through it, lets us see the layout that mattered: the faders, display and four pale sample buttons. Keep the full period page image at its natural scale and credit it as 1986 print, not as a pristine product photograph. Let readers open the separate reviews, follow the documented cassette and memory procedure, and hear music only through properly attributed release links or audio whose rights and exact origin are established. The four little buttons should remain the visual refrain. They made a real request of the player: choose what to bring into the rhythm, and make those few fractions of a second count.

The machine in the record

Todd Terry in the 909originals interview image.
Todd Terry in the 909originals interview image. He recalls using the Casio RZ-1 and repeated four-track bouncing while making “Can You Party” and “A Day in the Life”; the later press image does not show those sessions.

Todd Terry / “Can You Party”.

Todd Terry recalls using an RZ-1 and repeated four-track bouncing while making “Can You Party”. He does not allocate individual voices or identify the final mix, but the memory puts Casio’s sampler drum machine inside a decisive early-house workflow: repetition, tape and a groove built in layers.

Read Todd Terry interview: Sometimes you just gotta push it ↗

More records in the archive

The machine keeps turning up.

Coldcut’s Jonathan More and Matt Black, photographed for NME in 1987 by AJ Barratt.
Coldcut’s Jonathan More and Matt Black, photographed for NME in 1987 by AJ Barratt. Matt Black’s accompanying Sound On Sound account says “Doctorin’ The House” had its drums programmed on a Casio RZ-1, then strengthened in the studio.

Coldcut / Matt Black and Jonathan More / Doctorin’ The House

Matt Black says Coldcut programmed the drums for “Doctorin’ The House” on a Casio RZ-1, then had the sounds strengthened in the studio.

Read Classic Tracks: Coldcut “Paid In Full” (Seven Minutes Of Madness) ↗
Cover artwork for Nathan Fake — Providence.
Nathan Fake — Providence: retained artwork gives this source-backed artist account a record context; it does not itself prove the machine, a specific sound, or a recording session.

Nathan Fake / Providence

Nathan Fake identifies a Casio RZ-1 among the drum machines behind Providence, retaining a compact 1986 sampling box inside a much later electronic-album workflow.

Read Nathan Fake on the hardware behind Providence ↗
Todd Terry in a lakeside portrait.
Todd Terry in a portrait published by 54house.fm. Terry’s 2023 interview places the Casio RZ-1 and a four-track process in his “A Day In The Life” production; this photograph does not show the machine or that session.

Todd Terry (producer) / A Day In The Life

RZ-1 and repeated four-track bouncing used in production.

Read Todd Terry interview: Sometimes you just gotta push it ↗
Pete Marriott in his studio, photographed for Bboy Tech Report.
Pete Marriott in his studio, photographed for Bboy Tech Report in 2014. In the accompanying interview, Marriott says the drum sounds on #REALHIPHOP were sampled with a Casio RZ-1; the photograph does not identify that sampler or a particular recording session.

Pete Marriott / #REALHIPHOP

Artist says album drum sounds were sampled with RZ-1.

Read Interview With Pete Marriott ↗
Cover artwork for Ilia Belorukov — Arzed-One.
Ilia Belorukov — Arzed-One: retained artwork identifies the release or source-recording context, not a machine, session or sound allocation.

Ilia Belorukov / Arzed-One

Ilia Belorukov says Arzed-One was made only with a Casio RZ-1, pushing its sequencer above 160 BPM until small timing shifts became drone-like material.

Read Ilia Belorukov / Arzed-One ↗
Cover artwork for Orion Agassi — Please.
Orion Agassi — Please: retained artwork identifies the release or source-recording context, not a machine, session or sound allocation.

Orion Agassi / Please

Ritmo Astral calls Orion Agassi’s “Dance Trakk” an RZ-1 drum-machine and sampler workout.

Read Orion Agassi / Please ↗

Reported association

Cover artwork for Steve Poindexter — Work That Mutha F****r.
Steve Poindexter — “Work That Mutha Fucker”: retained artwork identifies the release or source-recording context, not a machine, session or sound allocation.

Steve Poindexter / “Work That Mutha Fucker”

The published history reports the title track as built on a Casio RZ-1, with a vocal sample triggered from its high tom.

Read Chicago Reader account ↗
Cover artwork for Timothy J. Fairplay — Rule The Streets.
Timothy J. Fairplay — Rule The Streets: retained artwork identifies the release context, not a machine, session or sound allocation.

Timothy J. Fairplay / Rule The Streets

Dungeon Module describes Rule The Streets as recorded with Fairplay’s Casio RZ-1 central to the setup, and says “Livin’ It Up” was made entirely with its sampler.

Read Rule The Streets ↗
Cover artwork for Third Sight — The Symbionese Liberation Album.
Third Sight — The Symbionese Liberation Album: retained release artwork gives the documented machine story a record-world context; it does not depict the hardware, a session, or an individual track allocation.

Third Sight / The Symbionese Liberation Album

Third Sight’s album notes list the Casio RZ-1 among the equipment used to make the album.

Read Third Sight — The Symbionese Liberation Album ↗
01 // Landmark

Sampling comes within reach

The RZ-1 paired twelve built-in drum sounds with short user samples. A musician could capture a noise, a voice or a fragment of another instrument, then drop it straight into a pattern. For many players, that was the point: sampling became part of everyday rhythm making.

Sources (2)
  1. Open source 1 ↗
  2. Open source 2 ↗

02 // Landmark

A practical machine with character

Contemporary reviews liked the speed of the sampling process, the sturdy case and the separate outputs. They also found the machine demanding: memory was short, voices were shared and pattern changes called for planning. Those limits gave the RZ-1 its particular working rhythm.

Sources (3)
  1. Open source 1 ↗
  2. Open source 2 ↗
  3. Open source 3 ↗

03 // Landmark

Sounds from a cassette

The supplied Sound Collection cassette offered narrated samples of drums, Latin percussion and synthesized sounds. Users armed the machine, paused the tape at the spoken cue, then captured the sound as it played. It was an analogue route into a personal sample library, and a very 1986 way to make a beat stranger.

Sources (2)
  1. Open source 1 ↗
  2. Open source 2 ↗

04 // Landmark

A sampler that invited experiments

Reviews describe users trying piano chords and speech as readily as percussion. The RZ-1 was never only a replacement drum kit: it was a prompt to listen around the room and turn whatever was there into rhythm.

Sources (2)
  1. Open source 1 ↗
  2. Open source 2 ↗

05 // Landmark

Todd Terry’s four-track machine

Todd Terry’s account makes the RZ-1 feel less like an inexpensive sampler than a practical centre of gravity. He places it inside repeated four-track bounces on “Bango”, “Can You Party” and “A Day In The Life”. Pete Marriott later used the same Casio’s sampling capability for the drum sounds on #REALHIPHOP. The small memory and simple workflow became a method: commit, bounce, then make the next decision.

Sources (2)
  1. Open source 1 ↗
  2. Open source 2 ↗

MUSIC HISTORY

In the market

  • 1986-04: GBP 349 — UK review RRP; prototype explicitly identified in Goldstein review. RZ-1 Source ↗
  • 1986-04: GBP 399 — UK review RRP; prototype explicitly identified in Goldstein review. RZ-1 Source ↗

On record

  • Todd Terry (producer) — Bango. RZ-1 and repeated four-track bouncing used in production. Source ↗
  • Todd Terry (producer) — Can You Party. RZ-1 and repeated four-track bouncing used in production. Source ↗
  • Todd Terry (producer) — A Day In The Life. RZ-1 and repeated four-track bouncing used in production. Source ↗
  • Pete Marriott — #REALHIPHOP. Artist says album drum sounds were sampled with RZ-1. Source ↗
  • Nathan Fake — Providence. Nathan Fake identifies a Casio RZ-1 among the drum machines behind Providence, retaining a compact 1986 sampling box inside a much later electronic-album workflow. Source ↗
  • Direct Hit Productionz — beat-making source library. Direct Hit Productionz lists Casio RZ-1 sounds among the drum-machine sources used for its beat-making work. Source ↗
  • Steve Poindexter — “Work That Mutha Fucker”. The published history reports the title track as built on a Casio RZ-1, with a vocal sample triggered from its high tom. Source ↗
  • Ilia Belorukov — Arzed-One. Ilia Belorukov says Arzed-One was made only with a Casio RZ-1, pushing its sequencer above 160 BPM until small timing shifts became drone-like material. Source ↗
  • Orion Agassi — Please. Ritmo Astral calls Orion Agassi’s “Dance Trakk” an RZ-1 drum-machine and sampler workout. Source ↗
  • Timothy J. Fairplay — Rule The Streets. Dungeon Module describes Rule The Streets as recorded with Fairplay’s Casio RZ-1 central to the setup, and says “Livin’ It Up” was made entirely with its sampler. Source ↗
  • Third Sight — The Symbionese Liberation Album. Third Sight’s album notes list the Casio RZ-1 among the equipment used to make the album. Source ↗

Sources

  1. Casio RZ1
  2. Casio RZ1
  3. Sampling Perc!
  4. Beauty And The Beat, pp56–57
  5. Casio Digital Sampling Rhythm Composer RZ-1, pp92–93
  6. RZ-1 Service Manual & Parts List: cover and sampling circuit, printed pp.21–23
  7. RZ-1 owner instructions, Re-Manual 2005 edition, pp.26–28 and 35–36
  8. Todd Terry interview: Sometimes you just gotta push it
  9. Interview With Pete Marriott
  10. Pete Marriott / #REALHIPHOP / The Interview
  11. Ilia Belorukov / Arzed-One

The visual archive

Further visual evidence.

Sources for images shown earlier (8)
Additional visual sources (7)

Original publications and related image sources.

Machine Museum image viewer

Period image shown in the dossier.